Heels & Horsepower Magazine

AARTO: We Answer Your Questions About The Basics

What is AARTO? 

It is a law which creates an administrative process for handling less serious traffic violations which were previously handled by the criminal justice system.   It also introduces the concept of demerit points to deter habitual infringers. 

How are traffic violations treated by AARTO? 

AARTO divides traffic violations into two categories: infringements, which are less serious violations, and offences, which are more serious (such as reckless driving and drunken driving). The majority of traffic violations will be regarded as infringements. 

Schedule 3 to the AARTO Act shows which violations are regarded as infringements or offences. Offences are not handled administratively and require an appearance in court. 

Who administers AARTO? 

The AARTO Act creates the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA – soon to become the Road Traffic Infringement Authority) which will administer the Act. 

Who falls under AARTO? 

All road users, meaning private individuals, companies which own vehicles which don’t require an operator card (juristic persons), and companies which own vehicles which do require an operator card (operators). 

How does AARTO handle infringements? 

Infringements require the payment of a fine, which may initially be paid at a discount of 50%. If the fine remains unpaid after 32 days, the full fine is payable, and the motorist will be liable for the additional cost of a courtesy letter reminding them of the infringement notice.

What if I completely ignore a fine? 

If a fine remains unpaid for a further 32 days after a courtesy letter was issued, an enforcement order is issued. Under AARTO, unpaid fines do not proceed to summons and a court appearance. 

What happens if I have an enforcement order issued against me? 

An enforcement order comes with extra costs, and numerous licensing transactions will be blocked. For instance, you will be able to pay and renew your vehicle licence, but the authorities will not issue a licence disc. 

How are the fine values determined? 

Schedule 3 to the AARTO Act lists the relevant sections of the National Road Traffic Act, the charge code, demerit points and penalty units applicable to each traffic violation. 

A penalty unit is R100, so a charge with five penalty units would carry a fine of R500. 

The AA has requested the Department of Transport to review Schedule 3 in its entirety, since some trivial infringements unrelated to road safety (like not notifying the authorities of change of residential address within 14 days) carry a massive fine of R3000, while a serious violation like blinding oncoming traffic with one’s bright headlights has a fine of just R1500, despite the safety risk. 

I can’t afford the fine. What should I do? 

If you have exhausted the processes for contesting the fine, you can request to pay it in instalments over six months, in which case you will forfeit the discount. 

What else will I have to pay? 

A new fee of R100, the Infringement Penalty Levy (IPL), has been introduced, per infringement notice, although this amount may be increased by Ministerial regulation at any time. 

What if I wasn’t driving my car at the time? 

You can notify the authorities to redirect the infringement notice to the correct person. This is known as nomination. If you don’t know who was driving the car, you will be liable as the owner. 

What if I dispute the infringement notice? 

You can make a representation listing your objections, and the infringement notice will be reviewed for correctness and legality. 

Can an enforcement order only be issued against an individual? 

No. Enforcement orders can be issued against operators and juristic persons too. 

What if I’m not satisfied with the outcome of the representation process? 

You can approach the Appeals Tribunal to review your case. 

What if I dispute the Appeals Tribunal funding?

You can approach a Magistrate’s Court to have it reviewed, but be aware: the new amendments to the AARTO Act do not adequately outline the process for taking an infringement notice into the criminal justice system. 

As things currently stand, an enforcement order is not suspended while legal processes take place, meaning that a motorist who chooses to appeal their case to the Constitutional Court (the highest court in South Africa) would be blocked from many e-Natis transactions for as long as the case takes to conclude. 

This is at odds with the general rule that an appeal to a higher court automatically suspends an order or sentence after judgment until the appeals process is exhausted or the order or sentence is overturned. 

What are demerit points? 

Demerit points are an additional penalty to deter motorists from habitually committing traffic violations. Not all infringements attract demerit points. 

How many points can I incur, and what happens if I go over the limit? 

Your driving licence is suspended for three months for each point in excess of 15 (6 for a learner driver). 

Do demerit points fall away? 

Yes. For each three months in which you do not commit an infringement, one demerit point is removed. A driver with 15 demerit points against their licence will take almost four years to return to a clean licence if they do not commit any more infringements. 

A driver who attends a rehabilitation programme (yet to be defined by the RTIA) may have their points reduced by four upon successful completion. 

Do demerit points only apply to private individuals? 

No. They also apply to fleets of vehicles which are required to have operator cards, and to juristic persons, meaning an entity like a company or trust which owns a vehicle. In such cases, the demerit points are incurred against the vehicle’s operator card or licence disc, as may be the case. 

If a vehicle’s operator card or licence disc passes the 15-point maximum, it may no longer be driven on public roads. The sale or scrapping of a vehicle does not remove demerit points – they are automatically allocated to the next vehicle the operator or juristic person acquires, potentially leaving companies in a position where they have purchased a brand-new vehicle but cannot legally use it. 

Demerit points are removed at the rate of one every three months from operator cards and licence discs of vehicles owned by juristic persons, presuming no further infringements are committed. 

Small businesses and Corporate South Africa alike should take careful note of the above – poor driving standards by staff will lead to serious fleet management impacts. 

Will AARTO be a problem for companies which don’t own any vehicles? 

On the face of it, no. But if anyone incurs too many demerit points, they will be barred from driving until enough points fall away.

This will affect the ability of staff who are required to drive their private cars on business to do their jobs. AARTO does not distinguish between demerit points incurred in private time and those incurred while driving on company business, so companies whose staff drive on business are exposed to risk from poor driving standards, even if infringements occur in a staffer’s private time. 

Any company which has staff who drive on company business should have a plan to manage AARTO, including monitoring and reporting of staff demerit points, and implementing driving standards improvement programmes. 

How will AARTO impact on e-tolls in Gauteng? 

The Minister of Transport has indicated that, in light of serious concerns raised about e-tolls in the province, Cabinet will announce a decision on the future of the system going forward. It’s unclear when that announcement will be made. Until then, it’s not certain how AARTO will impact on the non-payment of e-tolls in Gauteng. 

Source: AASA

New Alcohol Laws Might Not Reduce Road Carnage in South Africa

Drinking and driving is a serious offense but the proposed laws changes to the law regarding drunk driving might cause more chaos than clarity for innocent motorists.

Proposed amendments to the National Road Traffic Act to reduce the legal blood alcohol limits for drivers to zero will criminalise innocent motorists, and is unlikely to have the results authorities think it will. This is the view of the Automobile Association (AA) in response to the National Road Traffic Amendments Bill, published at the end of October.

Included in the Bill is an amendment of Section 65 which effectively changes the legal blood alcohol content (BAC) limit for drivers from 0.05 grams per 100 millilitres to 0.00g/100ml, and the breath alcohol concentration from 0.24g/1000ml also to zero. 

Someone who is using medication which contains alcohol will now be arrested, charged and possibly prosecuted for having a small dose of alcohol in their blood while their driving ability has not been impaired

“These proposed changes are concerning on a number of levels and although the stated reason for the change is the promotion of road safety, within the current framework of traffic law enforcement, nothing will change, except that innocent drivers are likely to be criminalised. For instance, someone who is using medication which contains alcohol will now be arrested, charged and possibly prosecuted for having a small dose of alcohol in their blood while their driving ability has not been impaired,” notes the AA.

The Association says the proposed amendment is again making motorists soft targets for traffic law enforcers, and that the desired outcomes of improved road safety will not be met. 

“How will traffic law enforcement change to accommodate this proposed amendment? And, perhaps more importantly, how will a single piece of legislation change driver’s attitudes when nothing else around traffic law enforcement changes at the same time?

“Without proper and implementable actions, we don’t believe the amendments relating to the alcohol levels will have a material impact on our abysmal road fatality statistics,” said the AA

The Association says simply drafting legislation does not equate to meaningful road safety intervention and that other more important steps must be taken. These include a more intense, widespread and constant focus on national road safety education, an increase in the number of traffic law enforcement officers, and improved prosecution of current drunk driver cases.

Another important aspect of effective traffic policing is to ensure law enforcement is visible and active around known areas of drinking and driving, and that proper action is taken against offenders.

The Association notes, “We need to be in a situation where people are afraid to drive if they have been drinking, and we stand by our messaging of drink or drive. However, within this framework – and the interventions we have outlined – we believe a reduction of the BAC limit to 0.02g/100ml would be a more effective, just, and appropriate approach to drunk driving in the country”.

The AA says motorists who drink and drive must assume they will be arrested because there are many alternatives available to those who want to drink and still be mobile. But, it says, legally reducing the BAC to zero is not the answer.

“We cannot have a situation where authorities are amending legislation in the hope that this will change our shocking crash statistics. The average of 13000 deaths on our roads annually is a national crisis and amending this one piece of legislation is not going to make a difference unless those interventions we mention all the time are also implemented,” says the AA.

Be a considerate driver and use your indicators

With the advancement of technology and infrastructure, our lives have become far more fast-paced over the years.

Our time is precious and we do not want to spend all this time travelling when we could be spending it with our family and loved ones. Consideration for other road users often comes second to our desire to reach our destinations.

A good driver should not only be able to drive well, but should also be aware of his or her fellow road users. The oft-forgotten indicators, or, flickers, are an integral part of a motor vehicle’s control system, yet many experienced drivers often neglect to indicate in a proper manner, or even at all.

If you were taught to drive by a family member, chances are you’ve received a rebuke along the lines of “indicate your intention, not your action”. What this saying implies is that you start the indicating process before you take the intended action. Indicators are a proactive tool to avoid confusion on the roads, and go a long way to preventing accidents.

The National Road Traffic Act holds that any driver intending to stop, suddenly reduce speed, turn the vehicle left or right, or move the vehicle to the left or right on the roadway shall give a conspicuous signal of his or her intention, and of a sufficient duration to warn surrounding road users of his or her intention.

Indicators are a proactive tool to avoid confusion on the roads, and go a long way to preventing accidents.

Regulation 193 of the National Road Traffic Act provides that no person shall operate a motor vehicle on a public road, unless it is equipped on both sides with either the flasher type or illuminated window-type direction indicators. The only time that this regulation does not apply is in respect of a motorcycle, which was registered for the first time before 1 July 1976, or any motor vehicle, which, according to its registration certificate is older than 40 years.

Even the above exceptions cannot justify non-indicating, as the National Road Traffic Act makes provision for hand signals. According to the Act, to indicate a prospective left turn the driver should extend his or her right arm sideward from the shoulder with the forearm in a vertical and downward position and move his or her forearm in a circular anti-clockwise motion. To indicate a right turn the driver extends his or her right arm and hand sideward from the shoulder and fully horizontal to the road with the palm of the hand turned to the front.

Although it may seem like a tedious and obvious precaution at times, failing to indicate is a traffic violation, which can result in a traffic fine and may also cause a severe road crash

Of course, with the advent of modern vehicles, the use of hand signals is rendered mostly unnecessary. The National Road Traffic Act provides that instead of hand signals, the driver of a vehicle which is fitted with direction indicators shall signal his or her intention to turn or move to the left or right by operating the relevant direction indicator of the vehicle. The Act further holds that a driver who has put a direction indicator into operation to signal his or her intention to turn or move across to the left or right shall cease to keep such indicator in operation as soon as the need to signal has passed.

Although it may seem like a tedious and obvious precaution at times, failing to indicate is a traffic violation, which can result in a traffic fine and may also cause a severe road crash.

To promote a harmonious relationship between road users and no matter the experience of the driver or the circumstance under which we are driving, proper use of a vehicle’s indicators should always be observed. In a country where there are such high numbers of motor vehicle crashes yearly, the simple gesture of correctly using a vehicle’s indicators can create a safer driving environment for all our fellow road users.

Source: Automobile Association of South Africa